<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

[Practice problem solution provided.]

Find two fundamentally different interpretations that satisfy the statement

There exists one person who is liked by two people
.

One interpretation that satisfies this is a domain of three people Alice, Bob, Charlie,with the likes relation: Alice Bob Bob Bob . Bob is liked by two people, so it satisfies the statement.

Here's another interpretation that is the same except for renaming, and thus not fundamentally different: a domain of three people Alyssa, Bobby, Chuck,with the likes relation: Chuck Alyssa Alyssa Alyssa . With the substitutions [ Chuck Alice ] and [ Alyssa Bob ] , we see that the underlying structure is the same as before.

Here's an interpretation that is fundamentally different: a domain of three people Alice, Bob, Charlie,with the likes relation: Charlie Bob Alice Bob . No matter how you rename, you don't get somebody liking themself,so you can see its underlying structure is truly different than the preceding interpretations.

English is fuzzy enough that it is unclear whether

one
and
two
are meant as exact counts. The above two examples each assumed they are.
If we change the statement slightly to add a comma:
There exists one person, who is liked by two people
, we arguably change the meaning significantly.The now-independent first clause arguably means there is only one person existent in total, so the overall statement must be false!There's a quick lesson in the difference between English dependent and independent clauses.

Got questions? Get instant answers now!

For the four

Musketeer
formulas from a previous exercise , find three fundamentally different interpretationsof isFor which satisfy all the formulas on a domain of three people.

Depict each of these interpretations as a graph . Draw three circles ( nodes ) representing the three people, and an arrow ( edge ) from a person to each person they like.(You can glance at Rosen Section 9.1, Figure 8 for an example.)

One of the interpretations is unintuitive in that isFor and isAgainst don't correspond to what we probably mean in English.
Got questions? Get instant answers now!

Translate the following statements into first-order logic. The domain is the set of natural numbers, and the binary relation kth k n indicates whether or not the k th number of the sequence is n . For example, the sequence 5 7 5 , isrepresented by the relation kth 0 5 1 7 2 5 . You can also use the binary relations , , and , but no others.

You may assume that kth models a sequence. No index k is occurs multiple times, thus excluding kth 0 5 1 7 0 9 . Thus, kth is a function, as in a previous example representing an array as a function . Also, no higher index k occurs without all lower-numbered indices being present, thus excluding kth 0 5 1 7 3 9 .

  1. The sequence is finite.
  2. The sequence contains at least three distinct numbers , e.g. , 5 6 5 6 7 8 , but not 5 6 5 6 .
  3. The sequence is sorted in non-decreasing order, e.g. , 3 5 5 6 8 10 10 12 .

  4. The sequence is sorted in non-decreasing order,except for exactly one out-of-order element, e.g. , 20 30 4 50 60 .
Got questions? Get instant answers now!

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Intro to logic. OpenStax CNX. Jan 29, 2008 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10154/1.20
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Intro to logic' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask