<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Electronic professional development (termed here“e-PD”) also has broad implications for delivering training to very rural schools, where teachers and principals might otherwise not have the opportunity to attend training sessions due to distance or cost. The delivery of e-based professional development also makes it possible for larger numbers of participants to‘attend’the same training session(s), whereas the traditional lecture delivery method could reach only a small, isolated audience.

As we move forward into the 21st century, we find a strong relationship between educational reform and the use of technology for learning; technology enhances the learning power of the people who use it. The use of technology for professional development has begun to transcend the former isolationism of this kind of learning to a level of collaborative professional growth (Serim, 2007). The development of professional learning communities built around e-based platforms promises to encourage a lifetime of learning through online professional development opportunities for all educators.

References

Area Cooperative Educational Services (ACES). Professional development and school improvement. Retrieved March 30, 2007 (External Link)

Barth, R.S. (1986). Principal centered professional development. Theory into Practice, 25, 156-160.

Barth, R.S. (2001). Learning by heart. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bartlett, M. (2005, May 9). Generation x? So old school the emphasis is now on the‘Millennial’. Credit Union Journal.

Bezzina, M. (1994). Empowering the principal through professional development. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Teacher Education Association, July 3-6, 1994.

Boyer, E.L. (1983). A report on secondary education in America. New York: Harper&Row.

Caldwell, S.D. (2001). Effective practices for principals’in-service. Theory into Practice, 25, 174-178.

Center for Educational Policy Analysis. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from (External Link) whatweknow.pdf

DuFour, R.P. (1991). The principal as staff developer. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.

Evans, P.&Mohr, N. (1999). Professional development for principals: Seven core beliefs. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 530-533.

Foster, E., Loving, D.,&Shumate, A. (2000). Effective principals, effective professional development schools. Teaching and Change, 8, 76-98.

Frydenberg, J. (October, 2002). Quality standards in e-learning: A matrix of analysis. Retrieved April 29, 2007 from (External Link)

Hallinger, P.&Murphy, J. (1991). Developing leaders for tomorrow’s schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 514-520.

Howley, A., Chadwick, K.,&Howley, C.W. (2002, April). Networking for the nuts and bolts: The ironies of professional development for rural principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Joyce, B.&Showers, B. (1983). Power in staff development through research on training. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Killion, J. (2000, Summer). To reap benefits of online staff development, ask the right questions. Journal of Staff Development, 21.

Kleiman, G. M. (2004). Meeting the need for high quality teachers: e-Learning solutions. Retrieved March 30, 2007, from (External Link)

Malone, R.J. (2001). Principal Mentoring. (ERIC Digest No.149). Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED457535)

Mann, M. (1998). Professional Development for Education Leaders. PREL Briefing Paper, Honolulu, HI.

Murphy, J.&Hallinger, P. (1992). The Principalship in an Era of Transformation. The Journal of Educational Administration, special issue.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). State Education Reforms (SER) . Retrieved March 30, 2007, from Institue of Education Sciences U.S. Department of Education: (External Link)

National Staff Development Council. (2005). Learning to Lead, Leading to Learn: Improving School Quality Through Principal Professional Development. Retrieved March 15, 2005 from (External Link)

Neufeld, B. (1997). Responding to the Expressed Needs of Urban Middle School Principals. Urban Education. Vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 490-510.

Rhode Island Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2006). No Child Left Behind Federal Definition of High Quality Professional Development.pdf. Retrieved April 9, 2007, from Office of Educator Quality and Certification: http://www.ridoe.net/EducatorQuality/prodev.aspx

Rivera, R. J.,&Paradise, A. (2006). ASTD 2006 State of the Industry. Retrieved March 30, 2007, from ASTD: Workplace Learning and Performance: (External Link) .

Serim, F. (2007). Building Virtual Communities for Professional Development. Retrieved from (External Link) .

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2007). U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from Bureau of Labor Statistics: (External Link)

U.S. Department of Education Office of Postsecondary Education. (2005, October). The Secretary's Fourth Annual Report on Teacher Quality: A Highly Qualified Teacher in Every Classroom . Retrieved March 30, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/teachprep/2005Title2-Report.pdf

U.S. Department of Labor. (2006, August 4). Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from Bureau of Labor Statistics: (External Link)

Virginia Department of Education (April 2004). High-Quality Professional Development Criteria.

Warmack-Capes, D. (2005). Online Professional Development Courses for Teachers. School Executive. March/April.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Mentorship for teacher leaders. OpenStax CNX. Dec 22, 2008 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10622/1.3
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Mentorship for teacher leaders' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask