<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
This module covers the addition and subtraction of rational expressions.

Adding and subtracting fractions is harder—but once again, it is a familiar process.

1 2 + 1 3 = 3 6 + 2 6 = 5 6 size 12{ { {1} over {2} } + { {1} over {3} } = { {3} over {6} } + { {2} over {6} } = { {5} over {6} } } {}

The key is finding the least common denominator : the smallest multiple of both denominators. Then you rewrite the two fractions with this denominator. Finally, you add the fractions by adding the numerators and leaving the denominator alone .

But how do you find the least common denominator? Consider this problem:

5 12 + 7 30 size 12{ { {5} over {"12"} } + { {7} over {"30"} } } {}

You could probably find the least common denominator if you played around with the numbers long enough. But what I want to show you is a systematic method for finding least common denominators—a method that works with rational expressions just as well as it does with numbers. We start, as usual, by factoring. For each of the denominators, we find all the prime factors , the prime numbers that multiply to give that number.

5 2 2 3 + 7 2 3 5 size 12{ { {5} over {2 cdot 2 cdot 3} } + { {7} over {2 cdot 3 cdot 5} } } {}

If you are not familiar with the concept of prime factors, it may take a few minutes to get used to. 2 × 2 × 3 size 12{2 times 2 times 3} {} is 12, broken into its prime factors : that is, it is the list of prime numbers that multiply to give 12. Similarly, the prime factors of 30 are 2 × 3 × 5 size 12{2 times 3 times 5} {} .

Why does that help? Because 12 = 2 × 2 × 3 size 12{"12"=2 times 2 times 3} {} , any number whose prime factors include two 2s and one 3 will be a multiple of 12. Similarly, any number whose prime factors include a 2, a 3, and a 5 will be a multiple of 30.

A picture of fractions depicting the prime factorization of the denominators.

The least common denominator is the smallest number that meets both these criteria: it must have two 2s, one 3, and one 5. Hence, the least common denominator must be 2 × 2 × 3 × 5 size 12{2 times 2 times 3 times 5} {} , and we can finish the problem like this.

5 2 2 3 + 7 2 3 5 = 5 5 ̲ ( 2 2 3 ) 5 ̲ + 7 2 ̲ ( 2 3 5 ) 2 ̲ = 25 60 + 14 60 = 39 60 size 12{ { {5} over {2 cdot 2 cdot 3} } + { {7} over {2 cdot 3 cdot 5} } = { {5 {underline { cdot 5}} } over { \( 2 cdot 2 cdot 3 \) {underline { cdot 5}} } } + { {7 {underline { cdot 2}} } over { \( 2 cdot 3 cdot 5 \) {underline { cdot 2}} } } = { {"25"} over {"60"} } + { {"14"} over {"60"} } = { {"39"} over {"60"} } } {}

This may look like a very strange way of solving problems that you’ve known how to solve since the third grade. However, I would urge you to spend a few minutes carefully following that solution, focusing on the question: why is 2 × 2 × 3 × 5 size 12{2 times 2 times 3 times 5} {} guaranteed to be the least common denominator ? Because once you understand that, you have the key concept required to add and subtract rational expressions.

Subtracting rational expressions

3 x 2 + 12 x + 36 4x x 3 + 4x 2 12 x size 12{ { {3} over {x rSup { size 8{2} } +"12"x+"36"} } - { {4x} over {x rSup { size 8{3} } +4x rSup { size 8{2} } - "12"x} } } {} The problem
= 3 ( x + 6 ) 2 4x x ( x + 6 ) ( x 2 ) size 12{ {}= { {3} over { \( x+6 \) rSup { size 8{2} } } } - { {4x} over {x \( x+6 \) \( x - 2 \) } } } {} Always begin rational expression problems by factoring! The least common denominator must have two ( x + 6 ) size 12{ \( x+6 \) } {} s, one x size 12{x} {} , and one ( x 2 ) size 12{ \( x - 2 \) } {} .
= 3 ( x ) ( x 2 ) ( x + 6 ) 2 ( x ) ( x 2 ) 4x ( x + 6 ) x ( x + 6 ) 2 ( x 2 ) size 12{ {}= { {3 \( x \) \( x - 2 \) } over { \( x+6 \) rSup { size 8{2} } \( x \) \( x - 2 \) } } - { {4x \( x+6 \) } over {x \( x+6 \) rSup { size 8{2} } \( x - 2 \) } } } {} Rewrite both fractions with the common denominator.
= 3 ( x ) ( x 2 ) 4x ( x + 6 ) x ( x 2 ) ( x + 6 ) 2 size 12{ {}= { {3 \( x \) \( x - 2 \) ` - `4x \( x+6 \) } over {x \( x - 2 \) \( x+6 \) rSup { size 8{2} } } } } {} Subtracting fractions is easy when you have a common denominator! It’s best to leave the bottom alone, since it is factored. The top, however, consists of two separate factored pieces, and will be simpler if we multiply them out so we can combine them.
= 3x 2 6x ( 4x 2 + 24 x ) x ( x 2 ) ( x + 6 ) 2 size 12{ {}= { {3x rSup { size 8{2} } - 6x - \( 4x rSup { size 8{2} } +"24"x \) } over {x \( x - 2 \) \( x+6 \) rSup { size 8{2} } } } } {} A common student mistake here is forgetting the parentheses. The entire second term is subtracted; without the parentheses, the 24 x size 12{"24"x} {} ends up being added.
= x 2 30 x x ( x 2 ) ( x + 6 ) 2 size 12{ {}= { { - x rSup { size 8{2} } - "30"x} over {x \( x - 2 \) \( x+6 \) rSup { size 8{2} } } } } {} Almost done! But finally, we note that we can factor the top again. If we factor out an x size 12{x} {} it will cancel with the x size 12{x} {} in the denominator.
= x 30 ( x 2 ) ( x + 6 ) 2 size 12{ {}= { { - x - "30"} over { \( x - 2 \) \( x+6 \) rSup { size 8{2} } } } } {} A lot simpler than where we started, isn’t it?
Got questions? Get instant answers now!

The problem is long, and the math is complicated. So after following all the steps, it’s worth stepping back to realize that even this problem results simply from the two rules we started with.

First, always factor rational expressions before doing anything else.

Second, follow the regular processes for fractions: in this case, the procedure for subtracting fractions, which involves finding a common denominator. After that, you subtract the numerators while leaving the denominator alone, and then simplify.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Advanced algebra ii: conceptual explanations. OpenStax CNX. May 04, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10624/1.15
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Advanced algebra ii: conceptual explanations' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask