<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
v eq v oc
R eq v oc i sc

Use the open/short-circuit approach to derive the Thévenin equivalent of the circuit shown in [link] .

v oc R 2 R 1 R 2 v in and i sc v in R 1 (resistor R 2 is shorted out in this case). Thus, v eq R 2 R 1 R 2 v in and R eq R 1 R 2 R 1 R 2 .

Got questions? Get instant answers now!

For the circuit depicted in [link] , let's derive its Thévenin equivalent two different ways. Starting with theopen/short-circuit approach, let's first find the open-circuit voltage v oc . We have a current divider relationship as R 1 is in parallel with the series combination of R 2 and R 3 . Thus, v oc i in R 3 R 1 R 1 R 2 R 3 . When we short-circuit the terminals, no voltage appears across R 3 , and thus no current flows through it. In short, R 3 does not affect the short-circuit current, and can be eliminated. We again have a current divider relationship: i sc i in R 1 R 1 R 2 . Thus, the Thévenin equivalent resistance is R 3 R 1 R 2 R 1 R 2 R 3 .

To verify, let's find the equivalent resistance by reaching inside the circuit and setting the current source tozero. Because the current is now zero, we can replace the current source by an open circuit. From the viewpoint of theterminals, resistor R 3 is now in parallel with the series combination of R 1 and R 2 . Thus, R eq R 3 R 1 R 2 , and we obtain the same result.

Got questions? Get instant answers now!
All circuits containing sources and resistors can be described by simpler equivalentcircuits. Choosing the one to use depends on the application, not on what is actually inside the circuit.

As you might expect, equivalent circuits come in two forms: the voltage-source oriented Thévenin equivalent and the current-source oriented Mayer-Norton equivalent ( [link] ). To derive the latter, the v-i relation for the Thévenin equivalent can be written as

v R eq i v eq
or
i v R eq i eq
where i eq v eq R eq is the Mayer-Norton equivalent source. The Mayer-Norton equivalent shown in [link] can be easily shown to have this v-i relation. Note that both variations have the same equivalent resistance. The short-circuit current equals the negative of theMayer-Norton equivalent source.

Find the Mayer-Norton equivalent circuit for the circuit below.

i eq R 1 R 1 R 2 i in and R eq R 3 R 1 R 2 .

Got questions? Get instant answers now!

Equivalent circuits can be used in two basic ways. The first isto simplify the analysis of a complicated circuit by realizing the any portion of a circuit can be described by either a Thévenin or Mayer-Nortonequivalent. Which one is used depends on whether what is attached to the terminals is a series configuration (making theThévenin equivalent the best) or a parallel one (making Mayer-Norton the best).

Another application is modeling. When we buy a flashlightbattery, either equivalent circuit can accurately describe it. These models help us understand the limitations of abattery. Since batteries are labeled with a voltage specification, they should serve as voltage sources and theThévenin equivalent serves as the natural choice. If a load resistance R L is placed across its terminals, the voltage output can be found usingvoltage divider: v v eq R L R L R eq . If we have a load resistance much larger than the battery's equivalent resistance, then, to a good approximation,the battery does serve as a voltage source. If the load resistance is much smaller, we certainly don't have a voltagesource (the output voltage depends directly on the load resistance). Consider now the Mayer-Norton equivalent; thecurrent through the load resistance is given by current divider, and equals i i eq R eq R L R eq . For a current that does not vary with the load resistance, this resistance should be much smaller than theequivalent resistance. If the load resistance is comparable to the equivalent resistance, the battery serves neither as a voltage source or a current course. Thus, when you buy a battery, you get a voltage sourceif its equivalent resistance is much smaller than the equivalent resistance of the circuit to which you attach it. On the other hand, if youattach it to a circuit having a small equivalent resistance, you bought a current source.

He was an engineer with France's Postes, Télégraphe et Téléphone. In 1883,he published (twice!) a proof of what is now called the Thévenin equivalent while developing ways of teachingelectrical engineering concepts at the École Polytechnique. He did not realize that the same result hadbeen published by Hermann Helmholtz , the renowned nineteenth century physicist, thiry years earlier.
After earning his doctorate in physics in 1920, he turned to communications engineering when he joined Siemens&Halske in 1922. In 1926, he published in a German technical journalthe Mayer-Norton equivalent. During his interesting career, he rose to lead Siemen's Central Laboratory in 1936,surruptiously leaked to the British all he knew of German warfare capabilities a month after the Nazis invaded Poland,was arrested by the Gestapo in 1943 for listening to BBC radio broadcasts, spent two years in Nazi concentration camps, andwent to the United States for four years working for the Air Force and Cornell University before returning to Siemens in1950. He rose to a position on Siemen's Board of Directors before retiring.
Edward Norton was an electrical engineer who worked at Bell Laboratory from its inception in 1922. In the same month when Mayer's paper appeared, Norton wrote in an internal technical memorandum a paragraphdescribing the current-source equivalent. No evidence suggests Norton knew of Mayer's publication.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Fundamentals of electrical engineering i. OpenStax CNX. Aug 06, 2008 Download for free at http://legacy.cnx.org/content/col10040/1.9
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Fundamentals of electrical engineering i' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask