<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

The results of this study suggest that schools take at least five years to adapt, transform, andinstitutionalize a major change effort. Substantive change requires time to educate participants about what is being changed and timeto implement strategies that facilitate and sustain change efforts. Shorter timelines that are expected by the general public, schoolboard members, and other policy makers are counterproductive to sustaining change. Although this study examined changes in middleschools, the process of deep change at other school levels, mostlikely, will follow a similar process and use similar strategies, whether initiated at the district or school levels. Comprehendingchange theories and understanding how these theories guide the implementation of substantial change are essential components inthe knowledge base for educational administration.

Failure to change schools is often attributed to the incompetence of educators to alter the outcomes ofschooling. We suggest that the lack of deep levels of school reform is actually the failure of policymakers, school board members, andeducational leaders to fully understand the different levels of change, recognize the cycles of the change process, and comprehendthe strategies needed to facilitate and sustain second-order change.

Data from this study clearly confirm that the demands and expectations for current and future educational leadersexpand far beyond the knowledge and skills needed for instructional leadership alone. In this regard, the assertion by Fullan (2002) isappropriately stated:“The role of the principal as instructional leader is too narrow a concept to carry the weight of the kinds ofreforms that will create the schools that we need for the future”(p.17).

References

Alexander, W.M.&McEwin, C.K. (1989). Schools in the middle: Status and progress.

Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.

Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming organizational defenses: Facilitating organizational

learning. Needham, MA: Allyn&Bacon.

Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review,

69(3), 99-109.

Bloor, M. (2001). Focus groups in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Cuban, L. (1988). Constancy andchange in schools: 1880’s to the present. In Phillips W.

Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and

Practice (pp. 85-105). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

Creswell, John W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Duffy, F. (2004). Navigating whole-district change. The School Administrator, 1(61),

22-25. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

Fullan, M., (2002). The change leader. Educational Leadership. Alexandria, VA:

Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership&sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand

Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

George, P.S.; Stevenson, C.; Thomason, J.; Beane, J. (1992). The middle school and

beyond. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Heifetz, R. (2003). Adaptive work. In T. Bentley&J. Wilsdon (Eds.), The adaptive state

(pp. 68-78). London: Demos.

Hillary, J.C. (1990). Paradigm change: More magic than logic. Outcomes 9(4), 30-38.

Hord, S.M.; Rutherford, W.L.; Huling-Austin, L.; Hall, G.E. (1987). Taking charge of

change. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Kimberly, J.R.&Miles, R.H. (1980). The organizational life cycle: Issues in the

creation, transformation, and decline of organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Levy, A. (1986). Second-order planned change: Definition and conceptualization.

Organizational Dynamics (Summer), 5-20.

Miles, R.H.&Randolph, W.A. (1980). Influence of organizational learning styles on

early development. In John R. Kimberly&Robert H. Miles (Associates), The

Organizational Life Cycle: Issues in the Creation, Transformation, and Decline of

Organizations. (pp. 44-82). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Morgan, D.L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Perkins, D. (2003). King Arthur’s roundtable. New York: Wiley.

Sarason, S.B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change

course before it’s too late? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Senge, P.; et al. (2000). Schools that learn. New York: Doubleday.

Schwahn, C.&Spady, W. (1998). Why change doesn’t happen and how to make sure it

does. Educational Leadership 55 (7), 45-47.

Tyack, D.B.&Cuban, L. (1996). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school

Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Walzlawick, P, Weakland, J.H.&Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem

formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton, 1974.

Wheatley, M.J. (1992, 1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a

chaotic world. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Questions & Answers

I'm interested in biological psychology and cognitive psychology
Tanya Reply
what does preconceived mean
sammie Reply
physiological Psychology
Nwosu Reply
How can I develope my cognitive domain
Amanyire Reply
why is communication effective
Dakolo Reply
Communication is effective because it allows individuals to share ideas, thoughts, and information with others.
effective communication can lead to improved outcomes in various settings, including personal relationships, business environments, and educational settings. By communicating effectively, individuals can negotiate effectively, solve problems collaboratively, and work towards common goals.
it starts up serve and return practice/assessments.it helps find voice talking therapy also assessments through relaxed conversation.
miss
Every time someone flushes a toilet in the apartment building, the person begins to jumb back automatically after hearing the flush, before the water temperature changes. Identify the types of learning, if it is classical conditioning identify the NS, UCS, CS and CR. If it is operant conditioning, identify the type of consequence positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement or punishment
Wekolamo Reply
please i need answer
Wekolamo
because it helps many people around the world to understand how to interact with other people and understand them well, for example at work (job).
Manix Reply
Agreed 👍 There are many parts of our brains and behaviors, we really need to get to know. Blessings for everyone and happy Sunday!
ARC
A child is a member of community not society elucidate ?
JESSY Reply
Isn't practices worldwide, be it psychology, be it science. isn't much just a false belief of control over something the mind cannot truly comprehend?
Simon Reply
compare and contrast skinner's perspective on personality development on freud
namakula Reply
Skinner skipped the whole unconscious phenomenon and rather emphasized on classical conditioning
war
explain how nature and nurture affect the development and later the productivity of an individual.
Amesalu Reply
nature is an hereditary factor while nurture is an environmental factor which constitute an individual personality. so if an individual's parent has a deviant behavior and was also brought up in an deviant environment, observation of the behavior and the inborn trait we make the individual deviant.
Samuel
I am taking this course because I am hoping that I could somehow learn more about my chosen field of interest and due to the fact that being a PsyD really ignites my passion as an individual the more I hope to learn about developing and literally explore the complexity of my critical thinking skills
Zyryn Reply
good👍
Jonathan
and having a good philosophy of the world is like a sandwich and a peanut butter 👍
Jonathan
generally amnesi how long yrs memory loss
Kelu Reply
interpersonal relationships
Abdulfatai Reply
What would be the best educational aid(s) for gifted kids/savants?
Heidi Reply
treat them normal, if they want help then give them. that will make everyone happy
Saurabh
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Organizational change in the field of education administration. OpenStax CNX. Feb 03, 2007 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10402/1.2
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Organizational change in the field of education administration' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask