0.17 Impact on human health

Dioxins are organic compounds, usually produced as a byproduct of herbicide production. They are stable compounds and can accumulate in the environment. Dioxins also biomagnify through the food chain and can cause birth defects and death in wildlife. Although dioxin is known to be extremely toxic to mammals, its low-level effects on the human body are not well known. The infamous Agent Orange used as a defoliant during the Vietnam war contained a dioxin component. Many veterans from that war suffer from a variety of medical problems attributed to Agent Orange exposure.

Pesticides are used throughout the world to increase crop yields and as a deterrent to insect-borne diseases. The pesticide DDT was widely used for decades. It was seen as an ideal pesticide because it is inexpensive and breaks down slowly in the environment. Unfortunately, the latter characteristic allows it to biomagnify through the food chain. Populations of bird species at the top of the food chain, e.g., eagles and pelicans, are greatly affected by DDT in the environment. When these birds have sufficient levels of DDT, the shells of their eggs are so thin that they break, making reproduction impossible. After DDT was banned in the United States in 1972, affected bird populations made noticeable recoveries.

According to the World Health Organization, more than three million people are poisoned by pesticides each year, mostly in undeveloped countries, and about 220,000 of them die. Long-term exposure to pesticides by farm workers and workers in pesticide factories seems to be positively correlated with an increased risk of developing various cancers.

Heavy metals, dioxins and pesticides may all be endocrine disrupters . Endocrine disrupters interfere with the functions of hormones in the human body, especially those controlling growth and reproduction. They do this by mimicking certain hormones and sending false messages to the body. Because they are active even in low concentrations, endocrine disrupters may cause problems in relatively low doses. Some of the effects include low sperm count and sterility in males. Since 1940, sperm counts have dropped 50 percent in human males, possibly the result of exposure to endocrine disrupters.

Effects

An acute effect of a substance is one that occurs rapidly after exposure to a large amount of that substance. A chronic effect of a substance results from exposure to small amounts of a substance over a long period of time. In such a case, the effect may not be immediately obvious. Chronic effects are difficult to measure, as the effects may not be seen for years. Long-term exposure to cigarette smoking, low level radiation exposure, and moderate alcohol use are all thought to produce chronic effects.

For centuries, scientists have known that just about any substance is toxic in sufficient quantities. For example, small amounts of selenium are required by living organisms for proper functioning, but large amounts may cause cancer. The effect of a certain chemical on an individual depends on the dose (amount) of the chemical. This relationship is often illustrated by a dose-response curve which shows the relationship between dose and the response of the individual.

Lethal doses in humans have been determined for many substances from information gathered from records of homicides and accidental poisonings. Much of the dose-response information also comes from animal testing. Mice, rats, monkeys, hamsters, pigeons, and guinea pigs are commonly used for dose-response testing. A population of laboratory animals is exposed to measured doses under controlled conditions and the effects noted and analyzed. Animal testing poses numerous problems, however. For instance, the tests may be painful to animals, and unrelated species can react differently to the same toxin. In addition, the many differences between test animals and humans makes extrapolating test results to humans very difficult.

A dose that is lethal to 50 percent of a population of test animals is called the lethal dose-50 percent or LD-50. Determination of the LD-50 is required for new synthetic chemicals in order to give a measure of their toxicity. A dose that causes 50 percent of a population to exhibit any significant response (e.g., hair loss, stunted development) is referred to as the effective dose-50 percent or ED-50.

Some toxins have a threshold amount below which there is no apparent effect on the exposed population. Some scientists believe that all toxins should be kept at a zero-level threshold because their effects at low levels are not well known. That is because of the synergy effect in which one substance exacerbates the effects of another. For example, if cigarette smoking increases lung cancer rates 20 times and occupational asbestos exposure also increases lung cancer rates 20 times, then smoking and working in an asbestos plant may increase lung cancer rates up to 400 times.

Relative risks

Risk assessment helps us estimate the probability that an undesirable event will occur. This enables us to set priorities and manage risks in an effective way. The four steps of risk assessment are:

1. Identification of the hazard.
2. Dose-response assessment. Find the relationship between the dose of a substance and the seriousness of its effect on a population.
3. Exposure assessment. Estimate the amount of exposure humans have to a particular substance.
4. Risk characterization. Combine data from the dose-response assessment and the exposure assessment.

Risk management of a substance evaluates its risk assessment in conjunction with relevant political, social, and economic considerations in order to make regulatory decisions about the substance. In our society political, social, and economic considerations tend to count more than the risk assessment information. Signs of this are evident everywhere. People listen to loud music even though the levels are known to damage hearing. They smoke cigarettes that they know can cause cancer and heart disease.

People are often not logical in making choices. An example of this is a smoker who drinks bottled water because she is afraid tap water is unhealthy. Risk assessments have shown that a person is 1.8 million times more likely to get cancer from smoking than from drinking tap water. One possible explanation for this behavior is that people feel they can control their smoking if they choose to, but risks over which people have no control, such as public water supplies and nuclear wastes, tend to evoke more fearful responses. Because risk management deals with the unknown, it often is only loosely related to science.