This page is optimized for mobile devices, if you would prefer the desktop version just click here

3.4 Reality check: designing a new leadership program for the 21st  (Page 14/15)

Marks, H. M.,&Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. EducationalAdministration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397.

Mazzeo, C. (September 12, 2003). Issue brief of the Educational Policy Studies Division, National GovernorsAssociation Center for Best Practices. Washington, DC: Wallace Foundation, National Governors’Association.

Murphy, J. (1992). The landscape of principal preparation: Reframing the education of school administrators.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.

Portin, B. S., Knapp, M., Murphy, J.,&Beck, L. (2003). Self-reflective renewal in schools. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (2001). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective. Boston: Allyn&Bacon.

Southworth, G.&Doughty, J. (2006). A fine British blend. Educational Leadership, 63(8), 51. Stader, D.(April, 2003). A framework for reflection and clarifying dispositions. Paper presented at the Louisiana Association ofProfessors of Educational Administration. Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, Louisiana.

U.S. Department of Education. (2002, January 8). No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Washington, DC: Office ofElementary and Secondary Education. [Online]. Available:http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf.

Waters, J. T., Marzano, R. J.,&McNulty, B. A. (2003). Balanced leadership: What thirty years of researchtells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.Retrieved April 2, 2006, from www.mcrel.org/topics/productDetail.asp?topicsID=7&productID=144.

West, R. F. (November 7, 2003). Integrating the SREB modules into the principal preparation program at EastTennessee State University: A progress report. Paper prepared for the University Continuing Education Association Convention, Learning for Leadership and Leadership for Learning. Portland, OR.

Appendix A

Beginning Principals

FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEW

It may have seemed like you were“thrown to the wolves”when you became principals. Tell us what we need to teach new and aspiring principals.

  • What did you need to be successful?
  • What content in college classes did you need to use?
  • How should we address this content?
  • What types of field activities do candidates need?
  • How can we best prepare candidates to pass the licensure test?
  • What type of support do you need from the university?

Appendix B

Survey of Region 2 Superintendents and Administrators in Louisiana

The task before us: A RIGOROUS SELECTION SYSTEM

A rigorous system that chooses only the best candidates for principal preparation will encourage more talentededucators to seek out leadership programs, National Governors Association. How can universities and school systems work togetherto“tap”or select the right individuals for leadership preparation? Here are some ideas gathered from brainstormingsessions at the SREB Leadership Initiative summer conference.

Please check the ideas that you will support for recruitment and selection in your district.

<< Chapter < Page Page > Chapter >>

Read also:

OpenStax, Mentorship for teacher leaders. OpenStax CNX. Dec 22, 2008 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10622/1.3
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.
Jobilize.com uses cookies to ensure that you get the best experience. By continuing to use Jobilize.com web-site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.