<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

[Practice problem solution provided.]

While the following argument may sound plausible initially, give a particular situation where the conclusion doesn't hold (eventhough the premises do). Then, in a sentence or two, sketch why your counterexamplemay still represent rational behavior by pointing out a real-worldsubtlety that the initial argument ignored.

  1. If a certain outfit meets a dress code, then per force all less-revealing outfits also meet that dress code.

  2. In public transportation projects, out of two alternatives,the cheaper one which gets the job done is the better choice.

  1. It can be socially acceptable to wear my swimsuit into a fast-food restaurant.My underwear is less revealing than my swimsuit, and yet it would still raise many more eyebrows to go to thatrestaurant in my underwear, than my swimsuit.

    Clothes (and style in general) somehow encompass a form of communication,and people may object to an outfit's mood or message without actually objecting to how much the outfit reveals.(Other examples of communication-through-style include team logos, t-shirts with humorous slogans,and arm bands.)

  2. Buses are a lot cheaper than light rail. Yet, the light-rail here in Houston demonstrates that many peoplewho wouldn't routinely take a bus are willing to take light rail. (Only after we recognize this, can we try tofigure out what why the difference exists, and then brainstorm to find a better overall solution.)

Got questions? Get instant answers now!

Choose just one of the following informal arguments. While the argument sounds plausible initially,give a particular situation where the conclusion doesn't hold (even though the premises do).Then, briefly state why your counterexample may still represent rational behavior by pointing out a real-worldsubtlety that the initial argument ignored.

  1. [cell phone] Talking on a cell phone while drivingincreases the likelihood of an accident. Interestingly, hands-free phones do not significantly help . It's just the distraction of a phone conversationthat causes the problem.

  2. [equivalent products] If two companies offer two materially equivalent products,then most everybody will buy the cheaper one.

  3. [service] In a free market,if a company doesn't offer good service, individual customers will become fed up and take their businesselsewhere.

  4. [web browser] If there are two versions of a free web browser,and they run equally quickly, users will use the one with better features/interface.

  5. [door-locking] Anybody who really wants to break into your house while you're gonewill be able to. (For instance, using a towel to muffle sound,break the corner of a back window, reach in and unlatch the window, and climb through.)So there's no point in locking your front door.

Got questions? Get instant answers now!

[Practice problem solution provided.]

Let p , q , and r be the following propositions:

  • p : You get an A on the final exam
  • q : You do every exercise in the book.
  • r : You get an A in this class.
Write the following formulas using p , q , and r and logical connectives.

  1. You get an A in this class, but you do not do every exercise in the book.

  2. To get an A in this class, it is necessary for you to get an A on the final.

  3. Getting an A on the final and doing every exercise in the book is sufficient for getting an A in this class.

  1. r q

  2. r p

    Think of the English being reworded to

    If you got an A in this class,you must have gotten an A on the final.

  3. p q r

Got questions? Get instant answers now!

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Intro to logic. OpenStax CNX. Jan 29, 2008 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10154/1.20
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Intro to logic' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask