<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

The results of this study suggest that schools take at least five years to adapt, transform, andinstitutionalize a major change effort. Substantive change requires time to educate participants about what is being changed and timeto implement strategies that facilitate and sustain change efforts. Shorter timelines that are expected by the general public, schoolboard members, and other policy makers are counterproductive to sustaining change. Although this study examined changes in middleschools, the process of deep change at other school levels, mostlikely, will follow a similar process and use similar strategies, whether initiated at the district or school levels. Comprehendingchange theories and understanding how these theories guide the implementation of substantial change are essential components inthe knowledge base for educational administration.

Failure to change schools is often attributed to the incompetence of educators to alter the outcomes ofschooling. We suggest that the lack of deep levels of school reform is actually the failure of policymakers, school board members, andeducational leaders to fully understand the different levels of change, recognize the cycles of the change process, and comprehendthe strategies needed to facilitate and sustain second-order change.

Data from this study clearly confirm that the demands and expectations for current and future educational leadersexpand far beyond the knowledge and skills needed for instructional leadership alone. In this regard, the assertion by Fullan (2002) isappropriately stated:“The role of the principal as instructional leader is too narrow a concept to carry the weight of the kinds ofreforms that will create the schools that we need for the future”(p.17).

References

Alexander, W.M.&McEwin, C.K. (1989). Schools in the middle: Status and progress.

Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.

Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming organizational defenses: Facilitating organizational

learning. Needham, MA: Allyn&Bacon.

Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review,

69(3), 99-109.

Bloor, M. (2001). Focus groups in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Cuban, L. (1988). Constancy andchange in schools: 1880’s to the present. In Phillips W.

Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and

Practice (pp. 85-105). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

Creswell, John W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Duffy, F. (2004). Navigating whole-district change. The School Administrator, 1(61),

22-25. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

Fullan, M., (2002). The change leader. Educational Leadership. Alexandria, VA:

Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership&sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand

Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

George, P.S.; Stevenson, C.; Thomason, J.; Beane, J. (1992). The middle school and

beyond. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Heifetz, R. (2003). Adaptive work. In T. Bentley&J. Wilsdon (Eds.), The adaptive state

(pp. 68-78). London: Demos.

Hillary, J.C. (1990). Paradigm change: More magic than logic. Outcomes 9(4), 30-38.

Hord, S.M.; Rutherford, W.L.; Huling-Austin, L.; Hall, G.E. (1987). Taking charge of

change. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Kimberly, J.R.&Miles, R.H. (1980). The organizational life cycle: Issues in the

creation, transformation, and decline of organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Levy, A. (1986). Second-order planned change: Definition and conceptualization.

Organizational Dynamics (Summer), 5-20.

Miles, R.H.&Randolph, W.A. (1980). Influence of organizational learning styles on

early development. In John R. Kimberly&Robert H. Miles (Associates), The

Organizational Life Cycle: Issues in the Creation, Transformation, and Decline of

Organizations. (pp. 44-82). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Morgan, D.L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Perkins, D. (2003). King Arthur’s roundtable. New York: Wiley.

Sarason, S.B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change

course before it’s too late? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Senge, P.; et al. (2000). Schools that learn. New York: Doubleday.

Schwahn, C.&Spady, W. (1998). Why change doesn’t happen and how to make sure it

does. Educational Leadership 55 (7), 45-47.

Tyack, D.B.&Cuban, L. (1996). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school

Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Walzlawick, P, Weakland, J.H.&Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem

formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton, 1974.

Wheatley, M.J. (1992, 1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a

chaotic world. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Questions & Answers

Why is b in the answer
Dahsolar Reply
how do you work it out?
Brad Reply
answer
Ernest
heheheehe
Nitin
(Pcos∅+qsin∅)/(pcos∅-psin∅)
John Reply
how to do that?
Rosemary Reply
what is it about?
Amoah
how to answer the activity
Chabelita Reply
how to solve the activity
Chabelita
solve for X,,4^X-6(2^)-16=0
Alieu Reply
x4xminus 2
Lominate
sobhan Singh jina uniwarcity tignomatry ka long answers tile questions
harish Reply
t he silly nut company makes two mixtures of nuts: mixture a and mixture b. a pound of mixture a contains 12 oz of peanuts, 3 oz of almonds and 1 oz of cashews and sells for $4. a pound of mixture b contains 12 oz of peanuts, 2 oz of almonds and 2 oz of cashews and sells for $5. the company has 1080
ZAHRO Reply
If  , , are the roots of the equation 3 2 0, x px qx r     Find the value of 1  .
Swetha Reply
Parts of a pole were painted red, blue and yellow. 3/5 of the pole was red and 7/8 was painted blue. What part was painted yellow?
Patrick Reply
Parts of the pole was painted red, blue and yellow. 3 /5 of the pole was red and 7 /8 was painted blue. What part was painted yellow?
Patrick
how I can simplify algebraic expressions
Katleho Reply
Lairene and Mae are joking that their combined ages equal Sam’s age. If Lairene is twice Mae’s age and Sam is 69 yrs old, what are Lairene’s and Mae’s ages?
Mary Reply
23yrs
Yeboah
lairenea's age is 23yrs
ACKA
hy
Katleho
Ello everyone
Katleho
Laurene is 46 yrs and Mae is 23 is
Solomon
hey people
christopher
age does not matter
christopher
solve for X, 4^x-6(2*)-16=0
Alieu
prove`x^3-3x-2cosA=0 (-π<A<=π
Mayank Reply
create a lesson plan about this lesson
Rose Reply
Excusme but what are you wrot?
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Organizational change in the field of education administration. OpenStax CNX. Feb 03, 2007 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10402/1.2
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Organizational change in the field of education administration' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask