<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

The results of this study suggest that schools take at least five years to adapt, transform, andinstitutionalize a major change effort. Substantive change requires time to educate participants about what is being changed and timeto implement strategies that facilitate and sustain change efforts. Shorter timelines that are expected by the general public, schoolboard members, and other policy makers are counterproductive to sustaining change. Although this study examined changes in middleschools, the process of deep change at other school levels, mostlikely, will follow a similar process and use similar strategies, whether initiated at the district or school levels. Comprehendingchange theories and understanding how these theories guide the implementation of substantial change are essential components inthe knowledge base for educational administration.

Failure to change schools is often attributed to the incompetence of educators to alter the outcomes ofschooling. We suggest that the lack of deep levels of school reform is actually the failure of policymakers, school board members, andeducational leaders to fully understand the different levels of change, recognize the cycles of the change process, and comprehendthe strategies needed to facilitate and sustain second-order change.

Data from this study clearly confirm that the demands and expectations for current and future educational leadersexpand far beyond the knowledge and skills needed for instructional leadership alone. In this regard, the assertion by Fullan (2002) isappropriately stated:“The role of the principal as instructional leader is too narrow a concept to carry the weight of the kinds ofreforms that will create the schools that we need for the future”(p.17).

References

Alexander, W.M.&McEwin, C.K. (1989). Schools in the middle: Status and progress.

Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.

Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming organizational defenses: Facilitating organizational

learning. Needham, MA: Allyn&Bacon.

Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review,

69(3), 99-109.

Bloor, M. (2001). Focus groups in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Cuban, L. (1988). Constancy andchange in schools: 1880’s to the present. In Phillips W.

Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and

Practice (pp. 85-105). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

Creswell, John W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Duffy, F. (2004). Navigating whole-district change. The School Administrator, 1(61),

22-25. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

Fullan, M., (2002). The change leader. Educational Leadership. Alexandria, VA:

Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership&sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand

Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

George, P.S.; Stevenson, C.; Thomason, J.; Beane, J. (1992). The middle school and

beyond. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Heifetz, R. (2003). Adaptive work. In T. Bentley&J. Wilsdon (Eds.), The adaptive state

(pp. 68-78). London: Demos.

Hillary, J.C. (1990). Paradigm change: More magic than logic. Outcomes 9(4), 30-38.

Hord, S.M.; Rutherford, W.L.; Huling-Austin, L.; Hall, G.E. (1987). Taking charge of

change. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Kimberly, J.R.&Miles, R.H. (1980). The organizational life cycle: Issues in the

creation, transformation, and decline of organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Levy, A. (1986). Second-order planned change: Definition and conceptualization.

Organizational Dynamics (Summer), 5-20.

Miles, R.H.&Randolph, W.A. (1980). Influence of organizational learning styles on

early development. In John R. Kimberly&Robert H. Miles (Associates), The

Organizational Life Cycle: Issues in the Creation, Transformation, and Decline of

Organizations. (pp. 44-82). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Morgan, D.L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Perkins, D. (2003). King Arthur’s roundtable. New York: Wiley.

Sarason, S.B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change

course before it’s too late? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Senge, P.; et al. (2000). Schools that learn. New York: Doubleday.

Schwahn, C.&Spady, W. (1998). Why change doesn’t happen and how to make sure it

does. Educational Leadership 55 (7), 45-47.

Tyack, D.B.&Cuban, L. (1996). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school

Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Walzlawick, P, Weakland, J.H.&Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem

formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton, 1974.

Wheatley, M.J. (1992, 1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a

chaotic world. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Organizational change in the field of education administration. OpenStax CNX. Feb 03, 2007 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10402/1.2
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Organizational change in the field of education administration' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask