<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Student responses assist MPA program faculty in curricular, instructional, and program assessment. This on-goingprocess of program development and course preparation is helpful in meeting the wide variety of students the program serves.Philosophical issues become a matter of discussion among MPA faculty and course content, development, and materials areregularly reviewed in an effort to ensure that each program’s requirements and student needs are being addressed.

Conclusion

Developing a quality innovative program is not an easy task. It is an ongoing process that requirescreativity, flexibility, collaboration, reflection, analysis, and response to public, institutional, and student concerns. There is agreat deal of overlap and hence commonality in professional standards among the three disciplines. It is important for programfaculty and instructors to be cognizant of similarities and differences between standards and ensure that required knowledgeand skills are addressed and assessed. The foundational knowledge presented in the MPA program is regularly recommended and requiredof anyone in a leadership position, whether it is in education, government, a nonprofit organization, or in the corporate world.Educational, non-profit, government, and for-profit organizations are not isolated in the world beyond academia. Members of theseorganizations interact, work together, and depend upon each other on a regular basis. What better way can there be than to preparethese future leaders together and for professors to model the integration and interactions in practice? The University ofMichigan-Dearborn is doing just that in their Masters of Public Administration program.

References

Beyer, B.,&Ruhl-Smith, C. (2000). Research and collaboration as keys to improved performance. Journalof the Intermountain Center for Education Effectiveness. 1(2), 35-40.

Bolman L. G.,&Deal, T. E. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership (2nd ed.).San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Bolman, L. G.,&Deal, T. E. (2004).Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership(3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Capasso, R. L.&Daresh, J. C. (2001). The school administrator internship handbook: Leading, mentoring,and participating in the internship program. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Council of Chief State School Officers.(1996). Interstate school leaders consortium: Standardsfor school leadership. Washington, DC: Author.

Cunningham, W. G.,&Cordeiro, P. A. (2000). Educational administration: 8 problem-based approachs.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Dell’Angela, T.&Washburn, G. (2004). Daley set to remake troubled schools. (2004, June 25). ChicagoTribune, pp. A1. A22.

Grossman, Kate N. (2004). Daley unveils plan to shut some schools to copy success stories. (2004, June 25).Chicago Sun-Times, METRO, p. 20.

Hersey, P.,&Blanchard, K. H. (1984). The management of organizational behavior (4th ed.). EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hoy, W. K.,&Miskel, C. G. (1996). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (5thed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Hoyle, J. R., English, F. W.,&Steffy, B. E. (1998). Skills for successful 21st century school leaders:Standards for peak performance. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

Kimbrough, R. B.,&Nunnery, M. Y. (1988). Educational administration: An introduction (3rd ed.). NewYork: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Lambert, L. (1995). Cultivating leaders. Association for California School Administrators. 24(5),6-9.

Lunenburg, F. C.,&Ornstein, A. C. (2000). Educational administration: Concepts and practices (3rded.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomas Learning.

McFarland, L.J., Senn, L. E.,&Childress, J. R. (1994). 21st century leadership: Dialogues with 100 top leaders. New York: The Leadership Press.

Milstein, M.,&Associates (1993). Changing the wav we prepare educational leaders: The Danforthexperience. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Morgan, G. (1986). Images of Organizations. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Murphy, J.,&Hallinger, P. (1993). Restructuring schooling: Learning from ongoing efforts. NewburyPark, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Murphy, J., Hawley, W.,&Young, M. ( 2005). Re-defining the education of school leaders. NCPEA EducationLeadership Review. 6(2), 48-55.

National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (1993). Principals for our changing schools:Knowledge and skill base. Fairfax, VA: Author.

Newmann, F. M.,&Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A Schools. Madison, WI: Center onOrganization and Restructuring of Schools.

Peterson, K. D.,&Finn, C. E. (1985, Spring). Principals, superintendents, and the administrator's art.The Public Interest, (79), 127-131.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (3rd ed.) Boston: Allyn andBacon

Rodriguez, F. J. (2000, Spring). Interdisciplinary leadership in the Americas: Vision, risk, andchange. Journal of the Intermountain Center for Education Effectiveness. 1(2), 64-71

Sergiovanni, T. J. Burlingame, M., Coombs, F.S.&Thurston, P.W. (1999). Educational governance and administration (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Seyfarth, J.T. (1999) The principal: New leadership for new challenges. Upper Saddle River, NJ: PrenticeHall, Inc.

Silver, P. (1983). Educational administration: Theoretical perspectives on practice and research.New York: Harper&Row, Publishers.

Starratt, R. J. (1996). Transforming educational administration: Meaning, community, and excellence. NewYork: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Technology Standards for School Administrators Collaborative (TSSA) (2004). Retrieved from (External Link)

U. S. Government (2002). No child left behind act of 2001: Reauthorization of the elementary and secondaryeducation act of 1965 (P.L 107-110). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Wilmore, E. L. (2002). Principal leadership: Applying the new educational leadership constituent council (ELCC)standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Questions & Answers

I'm interested in biological psychology and cognitive psychology
Tanya Reply
what does preconceived mean
sammie Reply
physiological Psychology
Nwosu Reply
How can I develope my cognitive domain
Amanyire Reply
why is communication effective
Dakolo Reply
Communication is effective because it allows individuals to share ideas, thoughts, and information with others.
effective communication can lead to improved outcomes in various settings, including personal relationships, business environments, and educational settings. By communicating effectively, individuals can negotiate effectively, solve problems collaboratively, and work towards common goals.
it starts up serve and return practice/assessments.it helps find voice talking therapy also assessments through relaxed conversation.
miss
Every time someone flushes a toilet in the apartment building, the person begins to jumb back automatically after hearing the flush, before the water temperature changes. Identify the types of learning, if it is classical conditioning identify the NS, UCS, CS and CR. If it is operant conditioning, identify the type of consequence positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement or punishment
Wekolamo Reply
please i need answer
Wekolamo
because it helps many people around the world to understand how to interact with other people and understand them well, for example at work (job).
Manix Reply
Agreed 👍 There are many parts of our brains and behaviors, we really need to get to know. Blessings for everyone and happy Sunday!
ARC
A child is a member of community not society elucidate ?
JESSY Reply
Isn't practices worldwide, be it psychology, be it science. isn't much just a false belief of control over something the mind cannot truly comprehend?
Simon Reply
compare and contrast skinner's perspective on personality development on freud
namakula Reply
Skinner skipped the whole unconscious phenomenon and rather emphasized on classical conditioning
war
explain how nature and nurture affect the development and later the productivity of an individual.
Amesalu Reply
nature is an hereditary factor while nurture is an environmental factor which constitute an individual personality. so if an individual's parent has a deviant behavior and was also brought up in an deviant environment, observation of the behavior and the inborn trait we make the individual deviant.
Samuel
I am taking this course because I am hoping that I could somehow learn more about my chosen field of interest and due to the fact that being a PsyD really ignites my passion as an individual the more I hope to learn about developing and literally explore the complexity of my critical thinking skills
Zyryn Reply
good👍
Jonathan
and having a good philosophy of the world is like a sandwich and a peanut butter 👍
Jonathan
generally amnesi how long yrs memory loss
Kelu Reply
interpersonal relationships
Abdulfatai Reply
What would be the best educational aid(s) for gifted kids/savants?
Heidi Reply
treat them normal, if they want help then give them. that will make everyone happy
Saurabh
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Organizational change in the field of education administration. OpenStax CNX. Feb 03, 2007 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10402/1.2
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Organizational change in the field of education administration' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask